一分快3漏洞|一分快3注册网

来源：一分快3玩法2024-06-05 17:48

推动“冷资源”变为“热产业”******

　　作者：常理

　　刚刚过去的2022年，对中国冰雪运动来说无疑是具有划时代意义的一年。2022年初的北京冬奥会和冬残奥会聚焦了全世界冰雪爱好者的目光，冰雪运动在我国打破了时间、空间的限制，实现了3亿人参与的目标，中国冰雪运动进入了新时代。

　　和2023年一起到来的是北京冬奥会过后的第一个雪季。随着疫情防控政策的优化，全国各地冰雪运动持续升温、活力四射：已经是第九届举办的全国大众冰雪季活动，预计将带动全国超1.5亿人次参与；在哈尔滨，松花江面积雪盈尺，冰上撑橇、冰上龙舟、雪地风筝等构成冬日北国别样风景；在上海，10多块季节性移动冰场如雪花般散布；在重庆，仙女山国家森林公园银装素裹，游客们尽享冬季运动的激情与欢乐……

　　行稳方能致远。过去几年，冰雪运动的种子在全国各地生根发芽、开枝散叶，冰雪产业成为不少地方经济发展的新引擎。前不久，中共中央、国务院印发的《扩大内需战略规划纲要（2022—2035年）》明确提出，推进冰雪运动“南展西扩东进”，带动群众“喜冰乐雪”，这彰显了我国持续发展冰雪运动的决心。冰雪运动种类丰富、形式多样，可满足不同年龄、不同门槛的消费人群需求。发挥好冬奥会余热，推动冰雪运动持续健康发展，将有利于我国进一步扩大内需、刺激消费、推动产业转型升级，为地方经济发展增添活力。

　　打好“融合牌”，让产业旺起来。冰雪产业链条长，上游涉及各种冰雪装备、器材，冬奥会上亮相的国产雪车、雪蜡车、冰刀、速滑服等，都是中国制造向冰雪产业拓展的成功案例；下游涉及文化、旅游、培训等行业，集聚了大量资源，“冰雪+”正成为人们冬季休闲健身的新选择。进一步推动冰雪产业与关联产业需求对接、资源整合、协同发展，提供更加多元的产品和服务，打造具有中国特色的冰雪活动和赛事IP，让冰雪运动的激情保持下去，成为全民健身新方式、健康中国新动力、社会活动新时尚。

　　打好“四季牌”，让企业强起来。众所周知，冰雪运动对于季节性的要求很高，一些欧洲国家雪季持续时间较长，雪场经营具备先天优势。在我国，由于气候原因，很多雪场一个雪季的运营时间仅3至4个月。这就要求企业打好“四季牌”，冬季滑雪，春季踏青、夏季避暑、秋季露营，探索冰雪场地建设和季节转换新路径，满足不同季节、不同消费群体的运动休闲需要。目前，中国冰雪市场还处在起步阶段，百姓对于冰雪运动的喜爱需要一个培育过程，企业需要沉下心来，练好内功，不断为冰雪运动发展创造营造良好氛围。

　　打好“民生牌”，让群众富起来。冰天雪地也是金山银山。我国冰雪资源丰富，这些年，各地通过发展冰雪产业，建设了一批冰雪小镇以及冰雪度假胜地，不仅提升了当地知名度，引来投资和消费，还提高了当地老百姓收入水平，促进地方产业转型和经济发展。作为北京冬奥会雪上项目主要竞赛场地之一，崇礼从一个小县城变成了世界闻名的滑雪胜地，不少当地人端起了“雪饭碗”，吃上了“冰雪饭”。因此，要不断推动“冷资源”变为“热产业”，释放冰雪红利，让冰雪运动进一步火起来。（常理）

一分快3漏洞

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.